By Our correspondent
This brief
review dwells mostly on what I consider major omissions in the report, which,
if included, would have added more value to the findings.
CHAPTER ONE
1.0 LEGAL, REGULATORY AND POLICY REGIME
The
findings should have been specific about the key role played by the Director of
Information in suppressing press freedom, particularly with regard to
newspapers, during the period under review.
It should
be noted that it was specifically the Director of Information who used powers
vested in his office to ban newspapers viewed as critical of the government.
Editors
were also frequently summoned to either appear in person at the Tanzania
Information Services (Maelezo) offices, or ordered to explain in writing content
that apparently did not go down well with the powers that be.
There were
also instances of editors being intimidated into not publishing content that
was viewed as “hostile”, particularly when reporters sought the chief
government spokesperson’s response in order to balance their stories.
This
contributed a great deal to the self-censorship that was prevalent during the
period under review.
CHAPTER TWO
PRESS FREEDOM VIOLATIONS
The blocking
of some social media platforms, especially Twitter, in Tanzania in the run-up
to, during and after the 2020 General Election should have been expounded.
People
could only access Twitter through Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) on their
mobile phones, and this only ended after President John Pombe Magufuli’s death
in March 2021.
It should
be noted that most mainstream media houses in Tanzania operate Twitter
handles. However, most of Magufuli’s
fiercest critics used Twitter to air their views, and this is thought to be the
real reason behind the decision to block the platform in Tanzania.
Media
houses that also use Twitter to disseminate information and direct traffic to
their websites and other online platforms thus were effectively gagged for
several months.
I think
some of the respondents would have arrived at this conclusion had they been
asked to air their views on the government’s decision to block Twitter.
CHAPTER THREE
MEDIA INVESTMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
It is true
that internet penetration is threatening traditional media, and this has been
relatively well articulated in the report, but the fact that most newspaper
companies are now placing more weight on online platforms deserved to be mentioned
and discussed at length.
The way
people access and use news has changed dramatically in the last decade or so following
the proliferation of smartphones and cheaper internet access. This has put tremendous
pressure on newspapers, which are now seemingly on their way out.
In fact,
companies such as Mwananchi Communications Limited (MCL) have already embarked
on the switch to digital publishing. MCL has an internal rallying call,
“Digital First”, which serves to project the bigger picture as far as the shift
online is concerned.
While
newspapers are still paying the bills even as firms move online, experts generally
agree that there will be few newspapers, if any, still in circulation in as
little as ten years’ time. The race is
now on for newspaper companies to build and grow online audiences as a
precursor to monetising content.
IPP Media Limited
Actually,
at its peak, IPP Media published ELEVEN newspapers, not nine as stated in the
report. Missing from the list in the report are the Daily Mail, Sunset, Alasiri, Komesha and Kasheshe. These were
published along with The Guardian, The
Financial Times, The Sunday Observer, Nipashe, Taifa Letu and Lete Raha.
This Day and Kulikoni
came later in the mid-2000s when some of the abovementioned titles were no
longer being published.
CHAPTER SIX
MEDIA TRAINING AND PROFESSIONALISM
On the
problem of “half-baked” graduates, I would have expected the respondents to touch
on the issue of aptitude of students enrolled for journalism and mass
communications course.
Do the
relevant institutions subject candidates to aptitude tests, or is their
previous academic performance the sole criteria for enrolment? Are aptitude tests relevant? These questions
were supposed to be posed to the respondents.
Mid-tier
and higher learning institutions need to ensure that they get the right
applicants for journalism and mass communication courses. Just as employers now feel that graduates need
to have to have something extra, and not just “paper qualifications”, colleges
and universities also need to look beyond “paper qualifications” when enrolling
journalism students.
The
government’s relentless crackdown on independent media and the impact of the
Covid-19 pandemic have been discussed at length, though largely separately. I think these are the twin factors that
brought most media houses to their knees during the period under review.
COVID-19 and its impact on journalism
As if
plummeting sales and a drastic fall in advertising revenue as a result of
hostile government policy were not bad enough, Covid-19 dealt most media houses
a mighty blow. Some had no choice but to shut down altogether.
Others,
including some big names in the industry, took extreme measures to stay afloat,
including retrenching staff and cutting the salaries of those who were
retained.
Conclusion
The report
is well written and highly informative as it gives unrivalled insight into the
media landscape in Tanzania during the period under review. It is the most comprehensive report on the
media in Tanzania in 2020 and 2021 I have seen so far.
It is a
must-read for anybody who wishes to understand the environment in which the
media operated and the challenges faced during that period.
The report
should be disseminated far and wide in both its soft and hard copy versions.
ENDS……
Comments
Post a Comment